![yosemite protools 12 video engine problem yosemite protools 12 video engine problem](https://www.filmtvsound.com/images/post-sound/AVID_logo.jpg)
- #Yosemite protools 12 video engine problem driver
- #Yosemite protools 12 video engine problem upgrade
- #Yosemite protools 12 video engine problem software
- #Yosemite protools 12 video engine problem mac
I have the hardware 610 preamps and did an A/B comparison with the Unison models and I'd defy anyone to reliably pick pick from the other. I was using the (older, firewire) Apogee Ensemble previously, which was also excellent, but the built-in DSP of the Twin is very useful and the new 'Unison' capability of the preamps is amazingly good. These are an exceptionally good interface.
#Yosemite protools 12 video engine problem software
I LOVE my Apollo Twin with its thunderbolt connector, its software console, and it slew of high performance plugins that don't use any part of the iMac's memory.
![yosemite protools 12 video engine problem yosemite protools 12 video engine problem](https://softron.tv/sites/default/files/styles/adaptive/public/productimages/OTAV4_Schedule_2.png)
I do a lot more editing these days than recording so about a year ago I downsized my sound device to a UA Apollo Twin. Right now i have a i7 iMac with 16 gb memory running Yosemite and Protools 10.3.8. I guess I really do believe that its the best interface available for anybody who sits in front of a computer screen doing pro-level sound editing every day for months at a time. I choose Reaktor first for sampling, and producing the kind of weird sounds and odd beat structures on which I thrive.īut I always come back to Protools to do music production, meaning anything that is multitrack and complicated. I like to use Audition occasionally, especially, if I am doing spectrographic analysis. Over the years I've tried lots of other recording, mixing, editing software, including Logic, Audacity, and Ableton Live. I realize that your question is actually asking if I would choose PT if I was starting over from scratch. My other major pieces of audio production software - Reaktor, Guitar Rig, Melodyne, Ableton Live, Audition - all seem to work fine with Yosemite. I know the software intimately, which is the main reason I plan to stick with it for the long term. I've been using PT professionally for over 20 years.
#Yosemite protools 12 video engine problem upgrade
Protools 10 shows a few minor problems working with Yosemite, and I'll probably upgrade to PT 11 in two or three more months. With a 24 bit interface, you can set a lower input level for headroom against accidental spikes, and still have plenty of bit depth. The main drawback with 16 bit recording is that you'll need to be more careful setting input levels, aiming closer to the clipping point to get a healthy bit depth.
#Yosemite protools 12 video engine problem mac
I'm not a Mac user, but I know that's a problem with some pocket recorders like the Zoom H2 when used as a USB recording interface (not in standalone mode) it only works in 16 bits that way.
#Yosemite protools 12 video engine problem driver
For 24-bit recording you'll need a device with its own supplied driver that works on your Mac. Are you (or is anyone) using this specific interface in class compliant mode?Unless something has changed recently, the big drawback to using a USB Class Compliant connection as a recording interface, is that it's limited to 16 bits only. I think these went to the class compliant mode sometime in 2014, so people having trouble may have been using the old driver. But I have seen some online posts about glitchy performance or clipping, etc. So one candidate is the Focusrite 2i2 which claims to run in class compliant mode, ergo plug and done. Thanks, I had seen some info on class compliant interfaces.